On the Prologue of John
Hear the trumpet of the Gospel, the thunder of the heavens, the Word of God! What does John say? In the beginning was the Word. Not: "after a long time the Word came to be," not: "the Word was made," not: "the Word had a beginning," but: In the beginning was the Word -- the "was" that denotes eternal existence, the "beginning" that has no beginning. The evangelist takes his stand in the same place where Moses stood at the opening of the Law: In the beginning God made heaven and earth. But Moses says "God made"; John says "the Word was." Moses says "in the beginning"; John says "in the beginning." John reaches behind the beginning of creation to the eternity of the Creator, and he finds the Word already there.
Why did John not write "in the beginning the Son was" or "in the beginning the Lord was" or "in the beginning the Christ was"? Why "the Word"? The teacher of the Church has always said: because the Word is the name that most perfectly expresses the mode of His eternal generation from the Father, the mode that surpasses all analogy but which has its best earthly image in the relationship between the mind and its word. As the word proceeds from the mind without dividing it, as the word makes the mind's thought external without the mind losing that thought internally, as the word is in every way consubstantial with the mind from which it proceeds while being distinct from it -- so, in an infinitely purer and more perfect mode, the eternal Word proceeds from the Father, making the Father's wisdom and love manifest without any division or diminishment of the Father.
And the Word was with God. Not merely near God, not merely alongside God, not merely in the presence of God -- but with God in the deepest sense of the preposition: face to face, turned toward God, in the eternal relation of the Son to the Father. This eternal face-to-face relation is the inner life of the Trinity: the Father eternally begetting the Word, the Word eternally proceeding from the Father and turned toward the Father in perfect love. John wants us to know from the first line of his Gospel that the one he is writing about is not a created being who happened to achieve a close relationship with God, but the eternal Son who is in the bosom of the Father, as he will say later, and from that bosom was sent into the world.
And the Word was God. This is the thunderclap. Not: the Word was divine, not: the Word was godlike, not: the Word was a god among gods. The Word was God -- the same God as the Father, equal in divinity, co-eternal, consubstantial. How can the Word be both with God and God? How can there be a distinction between the Word and God if the Word is God? Because God is Trinity: the Father is God, the Word is God, the Spirit is God; and the three are one God, not three Gods. The distinction of Persons does not divide the unity of the divine nature. John affirms both truths in a single verse: the Word is distinct from the Father (with God) and the Word is identical with the Father in nature (the Word was God).